Some teachers are simply dumb.

Travis Campbell · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

"Stan de SD" wrote in message$s64.984@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> @armory.com...
> > Stan de SD wrote:
> > >
> > > "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > > @armory.com...
> > > > Stan de SD wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > > > > @armory.com...
> > > > > > OrionCA wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 02 May 2005 05:16:35 GMT, "R. Steve Walz"
> > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Well it does produce a lot of blithering idiots.
> > > > > > > >------------------
> > > > > > > >You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
> > > > > > > >education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right are
> > > > > > > >composed of academic losers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I gather you attended Berkeley.
> > > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > > You didn't gather correctly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And the college-educated systematically become more Liberal no
> matter
> > > > > > which college or university they attend!
> > > > >
> > > > > Funny, but one of my best friends, an African-American guy I went
to
> > > school
> > > > > with at Cal, started out there as a moderate liberal and left as a
> > > > > Bush-supporting Republican
> > > > -----------------------------
> > > > Liar.
> > > > Then the poor little retarded bastard was unable to get
> > > > an education!!
> > >
> > > No, he went on to law school and passed the Patent Bar a few years
ago.
> > > He's
> > > pretty damn good too, having won one IP case for me already.
> > ---------------
> > Law school isn't education, it's obediance school for the pets of
> > the wealthy.
>
> Lemme guess, you washed out of school, right?

Pretty obvious that since you cannot contribute anything but gossip and
parrot shit you are one dumb motherfucker who should've been aborted about 3
generations ago.
Now I know racist cocksucking, brown shirted NAZIS like you understand the
MASTER RACE bullshit.
Try it on your own miserable ass.

Archived from group: alt>non>racism

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

Stan de SD wrote:
>
> "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > > He's
> > > pretty damn good too, having won one IP case for me already.
> > ---------------
> > Law school isn't education, it's obediance school for the pets of
> > the wealthy.
>
> Lemme guess, you washed out of school, right?
------------------------------
Wrongo! You guessed quite badly, shit-mind.
Steve

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

Stan de SD wrote:
>
> "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > > > > The logical retort is, "Oh, so you didn't graduate."
> > > > -------------------
> > > > That's not "logical", because for all *I* know, you did!
> > >
> > > Uh. he was referring to you, Einstein... :O|
> > ------------------------------
> > But he didn't make that clear, so I turned it on him.
> > You're the unsubtle ignorant here.
>
> I guess
---------------------------
You guessed wrong once again, which is your only capacity.
And you just proved it, shit-licker.
Steve

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

Stan de SD wrote:
>
> "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > > > > Nah, he was pushing shopping carts around Sproul Plaza pretending to
> be
> > > > > "affiliated" with the University... :O|
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > You're another jackasss. Heard of it, never been there.
> > >
> > > Then you know nothing about Berkeley. Thanks for reminding me...
> > --------------------------
> > But point is that I *DO* know what *YOU* are:
> >
> > You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
> > education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right is
> > composed of academic losers.
>
> Funny how I actually learned something in school, and you haven't.
---------------------
You're unable to determine any such thing.
Which just means you're a shit-licking liar.
Steve

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

Tommy wrote:
>
> Stan de SD wrote:
>
> >
> > "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > @armory.com...
> >> Stan de SD wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> >> > @armory.com...
> >> > > Stan de SD wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "OrionCA" wrote in message
> >> > > > @4ax.com...
> >> > > > > On Mon, 02 May 2005 05:16:35 GMT, "R. Steve Walz"
> >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> Well it does produce a lot of blithering idiots.
> >> > > > > >------------------
> >> > > > > >You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
> >> > > > > >education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right is
> >> > > > > >composed of academic losers.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I gather you attended Berkeley.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Nah, he was pushing shopping carts around Sproul Plaza pretending
> >> > > > to
> > be
> >> > > > "affiliated" with the University... :O|
> >> > > ------------------------
> >> > > You're another jackasss. Heard of it, never been there.
> >> >
> >> > Then you know nothing about Berkeley. Thanks for reminding me...
> >> --------------------------
> >> But point is that I *DO* know what *YOU* are:
> >>
> >> You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
> >> education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right is
> >> composed of academic losers.
> >
> > Funny how I actually learned something in school, and you haven't. So much
> > for your theory...
>
> Ask him about 'String Theory'
-----------------------
I asked Tommy about String Theory and he pulled out the one he
hides in his butt.
Steve

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> R. Steve Walz wrote:
> > You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
> > education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right are
> > composed of academic losers.
>
> Proper studies don't involve ideology.
---------------------
Study of concepts does. You forget that Science
has a Deductive side and an Inductive side.
And the study of concepts requires logic be
the arbiter of reasonableness, which rightists
deny. Rightists don't like being argued with
because they always lose.

> Basically, right-
> wingers realized that these peer-reviewed studies almost
> always ended up against them, so they started their own
> groups where peer review is impossible.
-------------------------
It's not impossible, they simply don't permit it.

> Oh, and in the
> process, they shifted the blame for all of the world's
> problems from the corporate powers and their allies in the
> government to the intelligentsia.
---------------------------
They tried, and failed.
Steve

man_in_black529 · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 29

R. Steve Walz wrote:
> > Basically, right-
> > wingers realized that these peer-reviewed studies almost
> > always ended up against them, so they started their own
> > groups where peer review is impossible.
> -------------------------
> It's not impossible, they simply don't permit it.

I'd say reviewing something where they won't show you their
data is pretty much impossible.

> > Oh, and in the
> > process, they shifted the blame for all of the world's
> > problems from the corporate powers and their allies in the
> > government to the intelligentsia.
> ---------------------------
> They tried, and failed.

Where do you live? Read the book What's Wrong with Kansas?

Way Back Jack · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

On Tue, 31 May 2005 02:08:13 GMT, "R. Steve Walz"
wrote:

>> R. Steve Walz wrote:
>> > You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
>> > education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right are
>> > composed of academic losers.

The left is the haven for the piss-poor protoplasm who are too
incompetent or lazy to contribute to the advancement of human
civilization. They should be exterminated, not coddled, but the
leaders of the left are too frightened of this element to mete out the
proper action.

man_in_black529 · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 29

R. Steve Walz wrote:
> Kansas has no reason for what it believes, and when Kansans are
> all the slaves of AgriBusiness, then they'll say "ooops!".

And in the process take the other 49 states down with them.
Remember, these people don't always think rationally. So, if
we offer a logical proof that creationism's pure
unadulterated bullshit, they'll think of it as persecution.

Republicans have learned to use this quite well. Grover
Norquist compared the inheritance tax to the Holocaust, and
Bob Novak compared the filibuster (which by the dictionary
definition is conservative but American politicans abandoned
the English language entirely when Reagan said ketchup was a
vegetable) to the Holocaust.

Stan de SD · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 13

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message@armory.com...
> Stan de SD wrote:
> >
> > "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > > > > > Nah, he was pushing shopping carts around Sproul Plaza
pretending to
> > be
> > > > > > "affiliated" with the University... :O|
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > You're another jackasss. Heard of it, never been there.
> > > >
> > > > Then you know nothing about Berkeley. Thanks for reminding me...
> > > --------------------------
> > > But point is that I *DO* know what *YOU* are:
> > >
> > > You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
> > > education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right is
> > > composed of academic losers.
> >
> > Funny how I actually learned something in school, and you haven't.
> ---------------------
> You're unable to determine any such thing.
> Which just means you're a shit-licking liar.

Thanks for proving my point, Stevie... ;O)

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> R. Steve Walz wrote:
> > > Basically, right-
> > > wingers realized that these peer-reviewed studies almost
> > > always ended up against them, so they started their own
> > > groups where peer review is impossible.
> > -------------------------
> > It's not impossible, they simply don't permit it.
>
> I'd say reviewing something where they won't show you their
> data is pretty much impossible.
--------------------------------
Yup.

> > > Oh, and in the
> > > process, they shifted the blame for all of the world's
> > > problems from the corporate powers and their allies in the
> > > government to the intelligentsia.
> > ---------------------------
> > They tried, and failed.
>
> Where do you live? Read the book What's Wrong with Kansas?
--------------------------
Kansas has no reason for what it believes, and when Kansans are
all the slaves of AgriBusiness, then they'll say "ooops!".
Steve

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

Stan de SD wrote:
>
> "R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
> > > > > > > Nah, he was pushing shopping carts around Sproul Plaza
> pretending to
> > > be
> > > > > > > "affiliated" with the University... :O|
> > > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > > You're another jackasss. Heard of it, never been there.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then you know nothing about Berkeley. Thanks for reminding me...
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > But point is that I *DO* know what *YOU* are:
> > > >
> > > > You're just a rightist asswipe who doesn't like the FACT that
> > > > education is universally Liberalizing, and that the Right is
> > > > composed of academic losers.
> > >
> > > Funny how I actually learned something in school, and you haven't.
> > ---------------------
> > You're unable to determine any such thing.
> > Which just means you're a shit-licking liar.
>
> Thanks for proving my point, Stevie... ;O)
----------------------------
You're delusional if you imagine anything I've ever said proves
anything you (and I use the term comedically) "think"!
Steve

man_in_black529 · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 29

R. Steve Walz wrote:
> > Oh, like James Mooney by any chance? LOL
> ---------------------------------
> Unimportant, like you.

I'd say the fact that turn-of-the-century anthropology
was riddled with fraud and racial bias is pretty damn
relevant.

man_in_black529 · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 29

R. Steve Walz wrote:
> Since NOBODY DOES turn of the 19th-20th century anthroplogy anymore,
> I'd say it isn't. That paradigm is long surpassed. We're immune.

Oh, so you're arguing that these sexual practices continued
into the late 20th century? (Clue: If you are, you're just
plain lying and I win.)

R. Steve Walz · Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 1906

man_in_black529@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> R. Steve Walz wrote:
> > > Oh, like James Mooney by any chance? LOL
> > ---------------------------------
> > Unimportant, like you.
>
> I'd say the fact that turn-of-the-century anthropology
> was riddled with fraud and racial bias is pretty damn
> relevant.
------------------
Since NOBODY DOES turn of the 19th-20th century anthroplogy anymore,
I'd say it isn't. That paradigm is long surpassed. We're immune.
Steve